One of the most difficult
professions today has to be that of a diplomat, or ambassador.
Even though time periods in the past have seemed incredibly
difficult, like say, World War II, or the Vietnam Conflict era, times
today are at least as difficult, if not more so. We find ourselves
fighting a war on terror, but mired down in various regions of the
Middle East and the Far East. Our enemies seem elusive,
ghostlike. Some of them used to be co-operative, like elements of
the former Iraqi army. Our enemies nowadays are religious fanatics
of the worst kind, wanting to die to go to heaven, and take lots of
innocents with them. To be a diplomat under these circumstances
would be difficult on a good day.
There have been times in the past
that have seemed dark indeed. During the days of the cold war, any
incident might trigger nuclear saber-rattling on the part of the US
or Soviet Union. For example, during the Yom Kippur war of 1973,
there were supposedly Soviet nuclear weapons being moved towards the
area of fighting between Israel and Egypt. The US went on
worldwide nuclear alert, and soon, these same weapons were detected
moving back where they came from. Or the time in the early 1980's ,
when a technology malfunction caused the US to temporarily go to high
alert, only to find out it was all a mistake, not any Soviet threat.
Nerves were jangled quite often in those days, and diplomats
probably got many tense phone calls, or made them, to calm things
down.
The hostage crisis in Iran,
precipitated by the Islamic Revolution there, is another example.
Some Americans managed to escape roving bands of Iranians by hiding
in the Canadian embassy. The staff there helped them conjure up an
escape plan, where they posed as a musical group, and assumed new
identities. They made it out, with much assistance from the Canadian
Embassy. Only one example of Ambassadors putting their own
fingerprints on history, and averting loss of life in the bargain.
When the Soviet Union fell apart
around 1991, affiliated states went off on their own. Old rivalries,
quashed during the Soviet era, re-surfaced, Thus, Yugoslavia broke
apart, and so did Czechoslovakia. The Baltic states fought ethnic
cleansing battles. The Serbs, Croatians, and others were at each
others throats. NATO finally had to step in and enforce the peace,
bombing Serb tanks and positions in the process. International
relations, once a black-and-white affair between the West and the
Soviets, was now a multi-hued quagmire, worse than a Louisianan
swamp. It seemed that the USA had more work than ever on its hands,
keeping the lid on a fractured world. The war between NATO and the
Serbs in the early '90's resulted in American national guard troops
being stationed in Slavic lands for the first time ever.
Around this time (1990), Saddam
Hussein's Iraq invaded Kuwait. The US had to send troops to expel
Hussein's army, and then specialists to put out the oil fires. More
work for the diplomatic corps, too. As the 1990's progressed, the
US restored relations with various Soviet satellite countries who
were newly independent. For example, Mongolia, Bulgaria, and even
Albania. Poland became a close ally of the US. But as time went
on, and the new Russian Federation strengthened under Vladimir Putin,
new warning signs arose. Things were no longer going to be a
cakewalk for the US. More issues arose for diplomats to sort out.
In 1998 terrorists tried to bomb
the World Trade Towers in New York. That was a wake-up call.
Then-president Clinton launched some cruise missiles at their
training camps in Afghanistan, then called it a day. But Al-Queda
was not finished. They finally got the “job done” by crashing
airplanes into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon in 2001. After
that, the US entered a virtual state of war with all terrorist
groups. This was a new situation. Not like a contained conflict on
a certain land area, this was a continuous conflict with shadowy
groups that moved around, nearly everywhere. So diplomats around
the world now had a new task, that of fighting terrorism, added to
their schedules. Given some of Pres. Bush's speeches, like the one
where he said “either you are with us or you are against us,”
the atmosphere was grim. Two years after the attacks, in 2003, we
invaded Iraq, supposedly because they were seen to be supporting
terrorism.
We succeeded in unseating Saddam,
only to unleash a quagmire. The three different tribal factions in
Iraq (Sunnis, Shi'ites and Kurds) lost their Hussein-inflicted
containment, and began fighting each other. After conquering the
country, the US attempted to “train” the Iraqi army. Then we
pulled most of our troops out, leaving a power vacuum. Immediately,
the factions went at each other, the central government did little or
could do little to prevent it. So extremist groups took to the
field, and now (in 2015) we see ISIS controlling a large swath of
Syria and Iraq, attempting to establish a new Caliphate or religious
state. You can't establish diplomatic relations with an illegal
state, founded on territory stolen away from legitimate states.
Especially one that tortures or murders anyone who opposes their
brand of religion. All you can do is try to contain them. Or evict
them by any means from their stolen territory. Perhaps the US is to
blame because of the 2003 invasion, and perhaps it is the Muslim
extremists who are to blame. After all, it was them who attacked us
on our soil to begin with. But in any case, international relations
are being strained quite a bit by this one.
Russia's rise from a fractured
state to a world power once again has been slow and steady. Vladimir
Putin and his supporters have consolidated their grip on power, and
established new ground rules. While Russia has a parliament, and is
on the surface a democratic society, it is only skin deep. The
reality is more like an autocratic, totalitarian government. But
Russia has a long history of heavy-handed governments, rounding up
and torturing its own people. Stalin was pretty good at this, even
executing his own generals before the second world war. Nowadays,
Russia is definitely a force to be reckoned with. I do not envy the
diplomats who must deal with this new, assertive
superpower-once-again. With thousands of nuclear weapons, millions
of troops, and lots of ships and aircraft, Russia simply cannot be
ignored or downplayed. But it seems that every time the US and
Russia are going to play nice together, some international incident
crops up to make that impossible. The latest is Turkey, a NATO
member, shooting down a Russian fighter jet. The diplomats must be
working overtime on that one.
But a quasi-state like ISIS or
ISIL is a common enemy of all the forces involved. They would do
away with all trappings of the modern society, and revert to some
medieval religious dictatorship. Women would be robed and masked
all the time, LGBTers just executed. Their religion would be forced
on everyone, under threat of torture or death. Just when it seemed
that perhaps all of the major world powers, even China, would gather
forces to eliminate this scourge, some incident happens to spoil it,
like the aforementioned jet being shot down. Diplomats, man your
phones.
A recent event where diplomats
actually lost their lives was in Benghazi, Libya a couple of years
ago. A small staff was manning a US Consulate there, headed by a
popular, affable FSA. Suddenly there was an attack, and everyone
inside was killed. At first it was said that a mob had stormed the
facility. But later it came out that the attack was planned,
coordinated by a branch of Al-Queda. There was a lot of finger
pointing, including blame placed on then secretary-of-state Hillary
Clinton. Funding requests for more embassy guards in the past were
turned down by Congress. Nevertheless, some of those same fossilized
congressmen blamed Clinton. In any case, it was a terrible tragedy,
illustrating just how risky it can be to be an international
diplomat.
The unrest and fighting in Libya
stemmed from the overthrow of Mumahdar Gaddafi, the then-strongman
leader. While his overthrow was seen as a positive at first, all
of the factions fighting each other soon became a problem. Oil
exports shrank, and societal structures broke down. And religious
extremists moved in to fill a power vaccuum. The movement to unseat
Gaddafi stemmed in part from the “Arab Spring” uprisings in
Egypt. People took to the streets to overthrow a long-established
corrupt government there. These successes spawned copycat movements
in other states, including Libya. Diplomats all over the region must
have been spending a lot of sleepless nights reporting on events and
occurrences. Not to mention trying to protect American citizens
and/or interests in the region. International relations put to the
test. Who do we talk to that is in power now, when power is changing
hands so fast. A democratically-elected government in Egypt with the
Muslim Brotherhood as the majority was quashed by the military almost
immediately after it was elected. The Muslim Brotherhood was
disbanded by edict. And a new government was put in place. Some
democracies are better than others, I guess. The US was put in the
position of dealing with various governments in Egypt, in rapid
succession!
Pakistan is another touchy
example. There is basically a military dictatorship there (could
be wrong). There are human rights violations, there is a
state-sponsored terror organization to undertake battles in the
Punjab, a region contested over with India. Pakistan also has a
nuclear arsenal. We have diplomatic relations with both India and
Pakistan, and must get along with both, even though they hate each
other, and have fought several wars. After many years of hunting,
the US finally found Osama Bin Laden, the head of Al-Queda. He was
living in a comfortable villa in Pakistan. The Paks knew we wanted
his head badly. They have intelligence apparatuses, they are not
dumb. And yet they claimed ignorance. But, we have to get along –
easier than fighting yet another war with someone. Diplomats, take
your vitamins.
Every time I think we surely live
in the most complicated age of international relations ever,
something else happens to add to the complexity. Today's terror
miasma makes the post WWII world look downright simplistic. It even
makes the world wars look simple by comparison. Thank goodness we
have a lot of computers to help us figure things out, otherwise we
would be completely lost. The International diplomatic corps has to
really be nimble on their feet to stay on top of things, and keep
relations on a positive course. Here is hoping they succeed, and
keep our world from self-destructing. Thanks for reading.
